From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of Autism Spectrum Disorder

•Extensive overview on pattern classification and stratification studies in ASD.•Compares pattern classification and stratifications approaches head-on.•Presents potential future directions for both approaches in ASD research.•Suggest promising avenues for clinical translation of these two approache...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews Vol. 104; pp. 240 - 254
Main Authors Wolfers, Thomas, Floris, Dorothea L., Dinga, Richard, van Rooij, Daan, Isakoglou, Christina, Kia, Seyed Mostafa, Zabihi, Mariam, Llera, Alberto, Chowdanayaka, Rajanikanth, Kumar, Vinod J., Peng, Han, Laidi, Charles, Batalle, Dafnis, Dimitrova, Ralica, Charman, Tony, Loth, Eva, Lai, Meng-Chuan, Jones, Emily, Baumeister, Sarah, Moessnang, Carolin, Banaschewski, Tobias, Ecker, Christine, Dumas, Guillaume, O’Muircheartaigh, Jonathan, Murphy, Declan, Buitelaar, Jan K., Marquand, Andre F., Beckmann, Christian F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2019
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Extensive overview on pattern classification and stratification studies in ASD.•Compares pattern classification and stratifications approaches head-on.•Presents potential future directions for both approaches in ASD research.•Suggest promising avenues for clinical translation of these two approaches. Pattern classification and stratification approaches have increasingly been used in research on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) over the last ten years with the goal of translation towards clinical applicability. Here, we present an extensive scoping literature review on those two approaches. We screened a total of 635 studies, of which 57 pattern classification and 19 stratification studies were included. We observed large variance across pattern classification studies in terms of predictive performance from about 60% to 98% accuracy, which is among other factors likely linked to sampling bias, different validation procedures across studies, the heterogeneity of ASD and differences in data quality. Stratification studies were less prevalent with only two studies reporting replications and just a few showing external validation. While some identified strata based on cognition and intelligence reappear across studies, biology as a stratification marker is clearly underexplored. In summary, mapping biological differences at the level of the individual with ASD is a major challenge for the field now. Conceptualizing those mappings and individual trajectories that lead to the diagnosis of ASD, will become a major challenge in the near future.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0149-7634
1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.010