Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions
► A study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigation on canola yield components. ► Results indicated that there was a significant crop growth and yield increase. ► Therefore, even though canola is thought to be dry land crop, irrigation is necessary under climatic conditions of...
Saved in:
Published in | Agricultural water management Vol. 98; no. 9; pp. 1403 - 1408 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.07.2011
Elsevier |
Series | Agricultural Water Management |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ► A study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigation on canola yield components. ► Results indicated that there was a significant crop growth and yield increase. ► Therefore, even though canola is thought to be dry land crop, irrigation is necessary under climatic conditions of the study.
With the availability of irrigation water, supplemental irrigation in winter-grown crops, such as lentil, wheat, and barley, has been intensely practiced to prevent crop yield losses due to the incidence of intermittent drought stress. In the crop growing seasons of 2006–2007 and 2008–2009, a study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigations on Canola (
Brassica napus L. cv. Elvis F1) under the semiarid climatic conditions of the Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. A sprinkler irrigation system was used to irrigate the study plots. The irrigation treatments included 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0 (full irrigation) of Class-A pan evaporation amounts. The full irrigation treatment during both years consisted of 250 and 225
mm, respectively. In turn, crop water use values during the same years and treatments were 462 and 449
mm. In general, plant height and 1000 seed weight ranged from 140 to 165
cm and from 2.5 to 3.3
g, respectively, and these variables significantly differed among irrigation treatments (
p
<
0.05). Crop yield and above ground biomass measurements were affected by irrigation treatments and varied from 1094 to 3943
kg
ha
−1 and from 6746 to 18,311
kg
ha
−1, respectively (
p
<
0.05). Similarly, harvest index values were affected (
p
<
0.05) and ranged from 0.16 to 0.23 on average. The water use efficiency obtained in the different treatments indicated a strong positive relationship between crop yield and irrigation. Overall, our results indicate that supplemental irrigation substantially increased canola yield; however, for an optimum yield, full irrigation is suggested. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.006 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0378-3774 1873-2283 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.006 |