Real-world data on neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual-anti HER2 therapy in HER2 positive breast cancer

• Published in: BMC cancer Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 134 - 10
• Main Authors: Yang, Zheng-Jun, Xin, Fei, Chen, Zu-Jin, Yu, Yue, Wang, Xin, Cao, Xu-Chen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 25.01.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Biomarkers; Breast cancer; Breast carcinoma; Cancer therapies; Chemotherapy; COVID-19; Dosage and administration; Dual-targeted therapy; ErbB-2 protein; HER2 positive; Lymphatic system; Methods; Monoclonal antibodies; Multivariate analysis; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Nomograms; Patient compliance; Patient outcomes; Regression analysis; Statistical analysis; China; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; HER2 positive; Breast cancer; Dual-targeted therapy
• ISSN: 1471-2407; 1471-2407
• DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11871-0

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual-targeted therapy is the standard treatment for human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Although the dual-targeted therapy has significantly improved the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, further investigation is needed to identify biomarkers that predict the response to neoadjuvant therapy. This retrospective study analyzed 353 patients with HER2-positive breast invasive ductal carcinoma. The correlation between clinicopathological factors and pCR rate was evaluated. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict the probability of pCR. The breast pCR (b-pCR) rate was 56.1% (198/353) and the total pCR (t-pCR) rate was 52.7% (186/353). Multivariate analysis identified ER status, PR status, HER2 status, Ki-67 index, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens as independent indicators for both b-pCR and t-pCR. The nomogram had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.78). According to the nomogram, the t- pCR rate was highest in the ER-PR- HER2-positive patients (131/208) and lowest in the ER + PR + HER2-positive patients (19/73). The subgroup analyses showed that there was no significant difference in pCR rate among the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in ER positive, PR positive, HER2 IHC 2 + , Ki67 index < 30% population. However, for ER-PR-HER2-positive patients, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen has a great influence on the pCR rates. Patients with ER-negative, PR-negative, HER2 3 + and high KI-67 index were more likely to achieve pCR. THP may be used as an alternative to AC-THP or TCbHP in selected HER2-positive patients.