A comparison of trust and reciprocity between France and Germany: Experimental investigation based on the investment game

We compare the results of a one-shot investment game, studied earlier by Berg et al. [Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1995) 122], for France and Germany. In this game, player A is the trustor and player B the trustee. The average level of investment is significantly larger in Germany, but the level...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of economic psychology Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 447 - 466
Main Authors Willinger, Marc, Keser, Claudia, Lohmann, Christopher, Usunier, Jean-Claude
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.08.2003
Elsevier Science
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesJournal of Economic Psychology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We compare the results of a one-shot investment game, studied earlier by Berg et al. [Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1995) 122], for France and Germany. In this game, player A is the trustor and player B the trustee. The average level of investment is significantly larger in Germany, but the level of reciprocity is not significantly different between the two countries. This implies that German B-players earned significantly more than French B-players. Furthermore, in both countries B-players earned significantly more than A-players. Our results support Fukuyama’s conjecture that the level of trust is higher in Germany than in France, a situation which can explain a higher rate of investment and a higher level of performance. However, our results also show that the increased revenue which is attributable to the higher level of trust, is not shared in a more equitable way, but essentially increases B-players’ payoffs. Finally, based on an intercultural trust experiment, we show that French A subjects did not find German B subjects less trustworthy and German A subjects did not find French B subjects less trustworthy.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-4870
1872-7719
DOI:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00165-4