Evaluating police drug diversion in England: protocol for a realist evaluation

There is increasing international interest in the use of police drug diversion schemes that offer people suspected of minor drug-related offences an educative or therapeutic intervention as an alternative to criminalisation. While there have been randomised trials of some such schemes for their effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth & justice Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 46
Main Authors Stevens, Alex, Hendrie, Nadine, Bacon, Matthew, Parrott, Steve, Monaghan, Mark, Williams, Emma, Lewer, Dan, Moore, Amber, Berlin, Jenni, Cunliffe, Jack, Quinton, Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 16.11.2023
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is increasing international interest in the use of police drug diversion schemes that offer people suspected of minor drug-related offences an educative or therapeutic intervention as an alternative to criminalisation. While there have been randomised trials of some such schemes for their effects on reducing offending, with generally positive results, less is known about the health outcomes, and what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why. This protocol reports on a realist evaluation of police drug diversion in England that has been coproduced by a team of academic, policing, health, and service user partners. The overall study design combines a qualitative assessment of the implementation, contexts, mechanisms, moderators and outcomes of schemes in Durham, Thames Valley and the West Midlands with a quantitative, quasi-experimental analysis of administrative data on the effects of being exposed to the presence of police drug diversion on reoffending and health outcomes. These will be supplemented with analysis of the cost-consequences of the evaluated schemes, an analysis of the equity of their implementation and effects, and a realist synthesis of the various findings from these different methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2194-7899
2194-7899
DOI:10.1186/s40352-023-00249-2