“Smart regulation”: Can policy instrument design solve forest policy aims of expansion and sustainability in Flanders and the Netherlands?

• Published in: Forest policy and economics Vol. 16; no. 8; pp. 23 - 34
• Main Authors: Van Gossum, Peter, Arts, Bas, Verheyen, Kris
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.03.2012
• Subjects: biodiversity conservation; certification; conflicts; Decision-making; Economics; education; Environmental policy; Flanders, Belgium; Forestry; governance; land-use; management; NEPI; Netherlands; Policy instrument; programs; Rational choice; Regulation; Responsive regulation; Success; united-states; Netherlands; Belgium, Flanders; Responsive regulation; NEPI; Rational choice; Policy instrument
• ISSN: 1389-9341; 1872-7050
• DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.010

The current study investigates with a multiple case study the relation between instrument design and policy success. The conclusion is that the instrument mix matters. The Flemish interventionist approach, which focuses more on traditional instruments, was not as effective as the Dutch stimulating approach, which uses a broad pallet of social and economic instruments, including many new environmental policy instruments. It is conspicuous that the government remains the most important regulator in all cases, although the importance of surrogate regulators is growing. Mostly the government is needed to stimulate or even create such surrogate regulators. Therefore, the government has a key position to decide which regulatory tasks will be transferred to surrogate regulators. This is currently restricted to capacity-building and certification.