Air sampling methods to evaluate microbial contamination in operating theatres: results of a comparative study in an orthopaedics department

To evaluate the level of microbial contamination of air in operating theatres using active [i.e. surface air system (SAS)] and passive [i.e. index of microbial air contamination (IMA) and nitrocellulose membranes positioned near the wound] sampling systems. Sampling was performed between January 201...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of hospital infection Vol. 80; no. 2; pp. 128 - 132
Main Authors Napoli, C., Tafuri, S., Montenegro, L., Cassano, M., Notarnicola, A., Lattarulo, S., Montagna, M.T., Moretti, B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the level of microbial contamination of air in operating theatres using active [i.e. surface air system (SAS)] and passive [i.e. index of microbial air contamination (IMA) and nitrocellulose membranes positioned near the wound] sampling systems. Sampling was performed between January 2010 and January 2011 in the operating theatre of the orthopaedics department in a university hospital in Southern Italy. During surgery, the mean bacterial loads recorded were 2232.9 colony-forming units (cfu)/m 2/h with the IMA method, 123.2 cfu/m 3 with the SAS method and 2768.2 cfu/m 2/h with the nitrocellulose membranes. Correlation was found between the results of the three methods. Staphylococcus aureus was detected in 12 of 60 operations (20%) with the membranes, five (8.3%) operations with the SAS method, and three operations (5%) with the IMA method. Use of nitrocellulose membranes placed near a wound is a valid method for measuring the microbial contamination of air. This method was more sensitive than the IMA method and was not subject to any calibration bias, unlike active air monitoring systems.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0195-6701
1532-2939
1532-2939
DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2011.10.011