Which factors predict proposal and uptake of psychological counselling after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure?
Objective The aim of this study is to prospectively determine the factors contributing to whether unaffected women from BRCA1/2 families reported that clinicians proposed psychological consultations and that they had attended these consultations during the genetic testing process. Methods A prospect...
Saved in:
Published in | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 420 - 427 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
The aim of this study is to prospectively determine the factors contributing to whether unaffected women from BRCA1/2 families reported that clinicians proposed psychological consultations and that they had attended these consultations during the genetic testing process.
Methods
A prospective study was performed on a national cohort, using self‐administered questionnaires to determine the rates of proposal and use of psychological services at the time of BRCA1/2 test result disclosure (N = 533) and during the first year after disclosure (N = 478) among unaffected French women from BRCA1/2 families who had undergone genetic testing for BRCA1/2. Multivariate adjustment was carried out using logistic regression models fitted using generalized estimation equations, with the genetic testing centre as the clustering variable.
Results
At the time of BRCA1/2 test result disclosure, a psychological consultation was proposed by cancer geneticists to 72% and 32% of the carriers (N = 232) and noncarriers (N = 301), respectively (p < 0.001). One year after disclosure, 21% of the carriers had consulted a psychologist, versus 9% of the noncarriers (p < 0.001). Both the proposal and the uptake depended on the women's BRCA1/2 mutation carrier status (proposal adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4–7.2; uptake AOR: 2.2; 95% CI 1.2–4.0), their level of education (proposal AOR: 1.7; 95% CI 1.1–2.7; uptake AOR: 4.5; 95% CI 1.7–12.1) and the distress they experienced about their genetic test results (proposal AOR: 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.03; uptake AOR: 1.04; 95% CI 1.02–1.06)
Conclusions
Determinants of the proposal/uptake of psychological consultations in the BRCA1/2 testing process highlight the need for inventive strategies to reach the different types of women's profiles. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:9599601A00F21B7C13E4F55239D79C432AC13E8B ArticleID:PON3435 GENEPSO cohort SIRIC - No. INCA-DGOS-Inserm 6038 Institut National du Cancer - No. RPT08011AAA ark:/67375/WNG-7T9K3FPM-2 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 1057-9249 1099-1611 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pon.3435 |