Which factors predict proposal and uptake of psychological counselling after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure?

Objective The aim of this study is to prospectively determine the factors contributing to whether unaffected women from BRCA1/2 families reported that clinicians proposed psychological consultations and that they had attended these consultations during the genetic testing process. Methods A prospect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsycho-oncology (Chichester, England) Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 420 - 427
Main Authors Maheu, Christine, Bouhnik, Anne-Deborah, Nogues, Catherine, Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Lasset, Christine, Berthet, Pascaline, Fricker, Jean-Pierre, Caron, Olivier, Luporsi, Elizabeth, Gladieff, Laurence, Julian-Reynier, Claire
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective The aim of this study is to prospectively determine the factors contributing to whether unaffected women from BRCA1/2 families reported that clinicians proposed psychological consultations and that they had attended these consultations during the genetic testing process. Methods A prospective study was performed on a national cohort, using self‐administered questionnaires to determine the rates of proposal and use of psychological services at the time of BRCA1/2 test result disclosure (N = 533) and during the first year after disclosure (N = 478) among unaffected French women from BRCA1/2 families who had undergone genetic testing for BRCA1/2. Multivariate adjustment was carried out using logistic regression models fitted using generalized estimation equations, with the genetic testing centre as the clustering variable. Results At the time of BRCA1/2 test result disclosure, a psychological consultation was proposed by cancer geneticists to 72% and 32% of the carriers (N = 232) and noncarriers (N = 301), respectively (p < 0.001). One year after disclosure, 21% of the carriers had consulted a psychologist, versus 9% of the noncarriers (p < 0.001). Both the proposal and the uptake depended on the women's BRCA1/2 mutation carrier status (proposal adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4–7.2; uptake AOR: 2.2; 95% CI 1.2–4.0), their level of education (proposal AOR: 1.7; 95% CI 1.1–2.7; uptake AOR: 4.5; 95% CI 1.7–12.1) and the distress they experienced about their genetic test results (proposal AOR: 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.03; uptake AOR: 1.04; 95% CI 1.02–1.06) Conclusions Determinants of the proposal/uptake of psychological consultations in the BRCA1/2 testing process highlight the need for inventive strategies to reach the different types of women's profiles. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:9599601A00F21B7C13E4F55239D79C432AC13E8B
ArticleID:PON3435
GENEPSO cohort
SIRIC - No. INCA-DGOS-Inserm 6038
Institut National du Cancer - No. RPT08011AAA
ark:/67375/WNG-7T9K3FPM-2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1057-9249
1099-1611
DOI:10.1002/pon.3435