Relationship between insulin sensitivity and bone mineral density in primary hyperparathyroidism

Summary Introduction Evidence of crosstalk between bone and insulin metabolism has been identified. In primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), scant data exist on this relationship. Aim To evaluate the relationship between insulin levels or sensitivity and bone mineral density (BMD) in PHPT. Subject and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical endocrinology (Oxford) Vol. 81; no. 3; pp. 350 - 355
Main Authors Gianotti, Laura, Tassone, Francesco, Baffoni, Claudia, Pellegrino, Micaela, Cassibba, Sara, Castellano, Elena, Magro, Gianpaolo, Cesario, Flora, Visconti, Gianluca, Borretta, Giorgio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2014
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Introduction Evidence of crosstalk between bone and insulin metabolism has been identified. In primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), scant data exist on this relationship. Aim To evaluate the relationship between insulin levels or sensitivity and bone mineral density (BMD) in PHPT. Subject and Methods Two hundred and sixty‐seven patients with PHPT without known diabetes mellitus were studied. Fasting blood glucose and insulin levels as well as BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck and forearm were measured. Insulin sensitivity was assessed using Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI). The same parameters were measured 2 years (interquartile range 2·8 years) after surgery (PTX) in a subgroup of patients (n = 51). Results In univariate analysis, a positive relationship between insulin levels and BMD (R = 0·17, P < 0·03) or T‐score (R = 0·20, P < 0·005) was found at femoral neck level. Consequently, a negative relationship between QUICKI and femoral BMD (R = −0·20, P < 0·01) or T‐score (R = −0·21, P < 0·004) was found. In multivariate analysis, when femoral BMD was the dependent variable, age (beta = −0·35, P < 0·000004), BMI (beta = 0·39, P < 0·00001), PTH (beta = −0·18, P < 0·05) and QUICKI (R = −0·15, P < 0·05) had an independent effect (R2 = 0·29). Insulin levels and QUICKI did not change after PTX. No relationship was found between QUICKI or insulin levels at the time of diagnosis and change in BMD at any site at follow‐up. Conclusions Our data show a weak relationship between insulin levels and/or insulin sensitivity and BMD in PHPT. However, the insulin state does not influence change in bone density after PTX in PHPT.
Bibliography:istex:71B828CEB366BA1C8A2244DAD8C6882F696062A1
ArticleID:CEN12472
ark:/67375/WNG-D0KFXXT3-V
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0300-0664
1365-2265
1365-2265
DOI:10.1111/cen.12472