Strategy Inventory for Language Learning-ELL Student Form: Testing for Factorial Validity

As the school-aged English language learner (ELL) population continues to grow in the United States and other English-speaking countries, psychometrically sound instruments to measure their language learning strategies (LLS) become ever more critical. This study adapted and validated an adult-orient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.) Vol. 97; no. 2; pp. 474 - 489
Main Authors Ardasheva, Yuliya, Tretter, Thomas R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2013
Wiley Subscription Services
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As the school-aged English language learner (ELL) population continues to grow in the United States and other English-speaking countries, psychometrically sound instruments to measure their language learning strategies (LLS) become ever more critical. This study adapted and validated an adult-oriented measure of LLS (50-item Strategy Inventory for Language Learning [SILL]; Oxford, 1990) for school-aged ELLs in a sample of 1,057 elementary, middle, and high school students. The two-stage validation process resulted in a shorter, 28-item version of the instrument, which we entitled the SILL—ELL Student Form. The results of confirmatory factor analyses indicated a good fit to the validation (GFI = .92, CFI = .93, RMSEA = .04, SRMR = .05) and combined (GFI = .95, CFI = .95, RMSEA = .03, SRMR = .04) samples. The new measure has strong psychometric characteristics for use with school-aged ELLs to diagnose their use of LLS in six distinct categories and is approximately half as long as the original SILL, which enhances its pragmatic value for busy classrooms. Additionally, this study addressed some of the theoretical issues with strategy categorization noted in the literature. Other applications of the measure for practice and research are discussed.
Bibliography:istex:CC46AC0FCF8A87CB31654F4E09498DCD08F249DD
ArticleID:MODL12011
ark:/67375/WNG-PQHS2XQP-D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0026-7902
1540-4781
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12011.x