Comparison of Care System and Treatment Approaches for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in China versus Europe: A CENTER-TBI Survey Study

• Published in: Journal of neurotrauma Vol. 37; no. 16; pp. 1806 - 1817
• Main Authors: Feng, Junfeng, van Veen, Ernest, Yang, Chun, Huijben, Jilske A, Lingsma, Hester F, Gao, Guoyi, Jiang, Jiyao, Maas, Andrew I R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Mary Ann Liebert, Inc 15.08.2020
• Subjects: Brain research; Collaboration; comparison; Consent; Hematoma; Hospitals; Intensive care; Medical ethics; Medical referrals; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Neurosurgery; Patients; provider profiling; Public health; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation; Skull; Surgery; TBI care; Trauma; Traumatic brain injury; variation; China; Europe; provider profiling; traumatic brain injury; comparison; variation; TBI care
• ISSN: 0897-7151; 1557-9042; 1557-9042
• DOI: 10.1089/neu.2019.6900

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a huge public health and societal problem worldwide. Uncertainty exists on how care system and treatment approaches for TBI worked in China may differ from those in Europe. Better knowledge on this is important to facilitate interpretation of findings reported by Chinese researchers and to inform opportunities for collaborative studies. We aimed to investigate concordance and variations in TBI care between Chinese and European neurotrauma centers. Investigators from 52 centers in China and 68 in Europe involved in the Collaborative European Neuro Trauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study were invited to complete provider profiling (PP) questionnaires, which covered the main aspects of care system and treatment approaches of TBI care. Participating Chinese and European centers were mainly publicly funded and academic. More centers in China indicated available dedicated neuro-intensive care than those in Europe (98% vs. 60%), and treatment decisions in the ICU were mainly determined by neurosurgeons (58%) in China while in Europe, (neuro)intensivists often took the lead (61%). The ambulance dispatching system was automatic in half of Chinese centers (49%), whereas selective dispatching was more common in European centers (74%). For treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension, a decompressive craniectomy was more frequently regarded as general policy in China compared with in Europe (89% vs. 45%). We observed both concordance and substantial variations with regard to the various aspects of TBI care between Chinese and European centers. These findings are fundamental to guide future research and offer opportunities for collaborative comparative effectiveness research to identify best practices.