Effects of anatomical differences on electromagnetic fields, SAR, and temperature change

ABSTRACT Electromagnetic field simulations are increasingly used to assure RF safety of patients during MRI exams. In practice, however, tissue property distribution of the patient being imaged is not known, but may be represented with a pre‐existing model. Repeatedly, agreement in transmit magnetic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConcepts in magnetic resonance. Part B, Magnetic resonance engineering Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 8 - 18
Main Authors Alon, Leeor, Deniz, Cem M., Carluccio, Giuseppe, Brown, Ryan, Sodickson, Daniel K., Collins, Christopher M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Egypt Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2016
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Electromagnetic field simulations are increasingly used to assure RF safety of patients during MRI exams. In practice, however, tissue property distribution of the patient being imaged is not known, but may be represented with a pre‐existing model. Repeatedly, agreement in transmit magnetic ( B1+) field distributions between two geometries has been used to suggest agreement in heating distributions. Here we examine relative effects of anatomical differences on B1+ distribution, specific absorption rate (SAR), and temperature change (ΔT). Numerical simulations were performed for a single surface coil positioned adjacent a homogeneous phantom and bovine phantom, each with slight geometric variations, and adjacent two different human body models. Experimental demonstration was performed on a bovine phantom using MR thermometry and B1+ mapping. Simulations and experiments demonstrate that B1+ distributions in different samples can be well correlated, while notable difference in maximum SAR and ΔT occur. This work illustrates challenges associated with utilizing simulations or experiments for RF safety assurance purposes. Reliance on B1+ distributions alone for validation of simulations and/or experiments with a sample or subject for assurance of safety in another should be performed with caution. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Engineering) 46B: 8–18, 2016
Bibliography:istex:D7C6C603DFDE952476EF7A37EC250A415B7985F8
NIH grants - No. R01-EB011551, R01-EB002568, and P41-EB017183
ark:/67375/WNG-VFQ0DPLD-4
ArticleID:CMRB21317
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1552-5031
1552-504X
DOI:10.1002/cmr.b.21317