Difference of Sagittal Alignment between Adolescents with Symptomatic Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis and the General Population

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 10956 - 9
• Main Authors: Zhao, Jian, Xiao, Yongqiang, Zhai, Xiao, Chen, Ziqiang, Li, Ming
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 19.07.2018; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 692/308/3187; 692/4023/1671/1811; 692/499; 692/698/1671/1811; Adolescent; Adolescents; Case-Control Studies; China - ethnology; Disease Progression; Female; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Logistic Models; Lumbosacral Region - diagnostic imaging; Lumbosacral Region - pathology; Male; multidisciplinary; Population studies; Postural Balance; Risk factors; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Spondylolisthesis; Spondylolisthesis - diagnostic imaging; Spondylolisthesis - ethnology; Spondylolisthesis - pathology; Teenagers; China
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29260-6

This case-control study aimed to investigate differences in the sagittal spinal parameters between the symptomatic spondylolisthesis patients and the general population. Twenty-nine adolescent patients with symptomatic lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis were included. For each patient, two age-matched, gender-matched and BMI-matched controls were enrolled. Comparison analyses detected higher values in the case group for the following parameters: CL (−22.06 ± 7.552° versus −20.36 ± 7.016°, P < 0.001), T1 Slope (19.84 ± 8.708° versus 13.99 ± 6.537°, P = 0.001), PT (21.54 ± 9.082° versus 8.87 ± 7.863°, P < 0.001), PI (64.45 ± 13.957° versus 43.60 ± 9.669°, P < 0.001), SS (42.90 ± 9.183° versus 34.73 ± 8.265°, P < 0.001), LL (−50.82 ± 21.596° versus −43.78 ± 10.356°, P = 0.042), SVA (16.99 ± 14.625 mm versus 0.32 ± 31.824 mm, P = 0.009), L5 Slope (33.95 ± 13.567° versus 19.03 ± 6.809°, P < 0.001), and L5I (8.90 ± 6.556° versus 1.29 ± 6.726°, P < 0.001). Conversely, TS-CL (6.56 ± 6.716° versus 11.04 ± 7.085°, P = 0.006), cSVA (11.31 ± 6.867 mm versus 17.92 ± 11.832 mm, P = 0.007), and TLK (−2.66 ± 10.101° versus 2.71 ± 7.708°, P = 0.007) were smaller in the case group. Slippage percentage was most correlated with PI (r = 0.530, P = 0.003), followed by PT (r = 0.465, P = 0.011) and L5I (r = 0.433, P = 0.019). Results of binary logistic regression showed that the main risk factor of isthmic spondylolisthesis was PI (OR = 1.145, 95%CI = 1.083–1.210, P < 0.001). Further subgroup analysis also showed that PI was the main risk factor of isthmic spondylolisthesis in the female adolescents (OR = 1.237, 95%CI = 1.086–1.493, P = 0.003) and in the male adolescents (OR = 1.523, 95%CI = 1.093–2.123, P = 0.013). PI was the main risk factor for adolescent symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis in the Chinese Han adolescents. The greater PI indicated the higher the progressive risk of spondylolisthesis. In these isthmic spondylolisthesis adolescents, the body always inclined forward and lumbar and cervical lordosis increased.