A Real-World Study of Optimal Treatment with Anlotinib First-Line Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

• Published in: Cancer management and research Vol. 14; pp. 3037 - 3046
• Main Authors: Li, Qingqing, Su, Tong, Zhang, Xu, Pan, Yanfeng, Ma, Shengli, Zhang, Lu, Zhang, Xianqiang, Gao, Xiaojuan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Macclesfield Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2022; Taylor & Francis Ltd; Dove; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: anlotinib; Antimitotic agents; Antineoplastic agents; Cancer therapies; Care and treatment; Clinical trials; Development and progression; Disease; Drug dosages; Growth factors; Hepatitis; hepatocellular carcinoma; Hepatoma; Hospitals; Liver cancer; Lung cancer; Mortality; Original Research; Patients; real world; sequential therapy; Transplants & implants; Tyrosine; China
• ISSN: 1179-1322; 1179-1322
• DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S379911

Purpose: To observe the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in a real-word environment, explore the optimal treatment regimen for patients with aHCC using anlotinib as a first-line treatment. Patients and Methods: Data from 62 patients with aHCC who received anlotinib single-drug first-line therapy between February 2019 and November 2021. Patients received anlotinib monotherapy, which may be interrupted or discontinued or changed in the event of unacceptable or severe adverse events (AEs) or failure to inhibit tumor progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Among the 62 patients, in the best overall response assessment, there were 12 with complete response (CR; 19.4%), 17 with partial response (PR; 27.4%), 25 with stable disease (SD; 40.3%), and 8 with progressive disease (PD; 14.5%). The ORR and DCR were 46.8% and 87.1%, respectively. Among the 11 patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors after disease progression, three (27.3%) had CR, one (9.1%) had PR, three (27.3%) had SD, and four (36.4%) had PD. Therefore, the ORR and DCR were 36.4% and 63.6%, respectively. The median PFS for anlotinib monotherapy was 7.37 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.88-8.86) and the median OS did not reach. AEs occurred in 95.2% of patients during anlotinib monotherapy, with the most common being thrombocytopenia (51.6%). The incidence of grade [greater than or equal to]3 AEs was 38.7%. Conclusion: Anlotinib is effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment for patients with aHCC. Treatment with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors after disease progression has also shown preliminary efficacy and safety; therefore, sequential therapy with anlotinib-TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors may be an effective treatment for patients with aHCC. Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, anlotinib, sequential therapy, real world