Molecular Characterization of Bacteriophages for Microbial Source Tracking in Korea

We investigated coliphages from various fecal sources, including humans and animals, for microbial source tracking in South Korea. Both somatic and F⁺-specific coliphages were isolated from 43 fecal samples from farms, wild animal habitats, and human wastewater plants. Somatic coliphages were more p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied and Environmental Microbiology Vol. 75; no. 22; pp. 7107 - 7114
Main Authors Lee, Jung Eun, Lim, Mi Young, Kim, Sei Yoon, Lee, Sunghee, Lee, Heetae, Oh, Hyun-Myung, Hur, Hor-Gil, Ko, GwangPyo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Society for Microbiology 01.11.2009
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We investigated coliphages from various fecal sources, including humans and animals, for microbial source tracking in South Korea. Both somatic and F⁺-specific coliphages were isolated from 43 fecal samples from farms, wild animal habitats, and human wastewater plants. Somatic coliphages were more prevalent and abundant than F⁺ coliphages in all of the tested fecal samples. We further characterized 311 F⁺ coliphage isolates using RNase sensitivity assays, PCR and reverse transcription-PCR, and nucleic acid sequencing. Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the partial nucleic acid sequences of 311 F⁺ coliphages from various sources. F⁺ RNA coliphages were most prevalent among geese (95%) and were least prevalent in cows (5%). Among the genogroups of F⁺ RNA coliphages, most F⁺ coliphages isolated from animal fecal sources belonged to either group I or group IV, and most from human wastewater sources were in group II or III. Some of the group I coliphages were present in both human and animal source samples. F⁺ RNA coliphages isolated from various sources were divided into two main clusters. All F⁺ RNA coliphages isolated from human wastewater were grouped with Qβ-like phages, while phages isolated from most animal sources were grouped with MS2-like phages. UniFrac significance statistical analyses revealed significant differences between human and animal bacteriophages. In the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), F⁺ RNA coliphages isolated from human waste were distinctively separate from those isolated from other animal sources. However, F⁺ DNA coliphages were not significantly different or separate in the PCoA. These results demonstrate that proper analysis of F⁺ RNA coliphages can effectively distinguish fecal sources.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0099-2240
1098-5336
1098-6596
DOI:10.1128/AEM.00464-09