Participation in a Public Insurance Program: Subsidies, Crowd-Out, and Adverse Selection

This paper examines how varying the level of subsidies affects participation in a public insurance program, crowd-out of private insurance, and adverse selection. We study the experience in Washington's Basic Health program in 1997. Findings show that adverse selection is not a problem in volun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInquiry (Chicago) Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 243 - 257
Main Authors Long, Stephen H., Marquis, M. Susan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA Excellus Health Plan, Inc 2002
SAGE Publications
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper examines how varying the level of subsidies affects participation in a public insurance program, crowd-out of private insurance, and adverse selection. We study the experience in Washington's Basic Health program in 1997. Findings show that adverse selection is not a problem in voluntary public programs. Increasing subsidies have only modest effects on participation in subsidized programs, though the gains are not at the expense of the private market. Overall participation in the subsidized plan is also modest, even though participants benefit from it. The challenge to policymakers is to find program design characteristics, beyond subsidies, that attract the uninsured.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0046-9580
1945-7243
DOI:10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.3.243