Delirium Risk Prediction, Healthcare Use and Mortality of Elderly Adults in the Emergency Department

Objectives To create a risk prediction rule for delirium in elderly adults in the emergency department (ED) and to compare mortality and resource use of elderly adults in the ED with and without delirium. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Urban tertiary care ED. Participants Individual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Vol. 62; no. 3; pp. 462 - 469
Main Authors Kennedy, Maura, Enander, Richard A., Tadiri, Sarah P., Wolfe, Richard E., Shapiro, Nathan I., Marcantonio, Edward R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2014
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives To create a risk prediction rule for delirium in elderly adults in the emergency department (ED) and to compare mortality and resource use of elderly adults in the ED with and without delirium. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Urban tertiary care ED. Participants Individuals aged 65 and older presenting for ED care (N = 700). Measurements A trained research assistant performed a structured mental status assessment and attention tests, after which delirium was determined using the Confusion Assessment Method. Data were collected on participant demographics, comorbidities, medications, ED course, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of stay, hospital charges, 30‐day rehospitalization, and mortality. Results Nine percent of elderly study participants had delirium. Using logistic regression, a delirium prediction rule consisting of older age, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, dementia, suspected infection, and acute intracranial hemorrhage was created had good predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.77). Admitted participants with ED delirium had longer median lengths of stay (4 vs 2 days) and were more likely to require ICU admission (13% vs 6%) and to be discharged to a new long‐term care facility (37% vs 9%) than those without. In all participants, ED delirium was associated with higher 30‐day mortality (6% vs 1%) and 30‐day readmission (27% vs 13%). Conclusion This risk prediction rule may help identify a group of individuals in the ED at high risk of developing delirium who should undergo screening, but it requires external validation. Identification of delirium in the ED may enable physicians to implement strategies to decrease delirium duration and avoid inappropriate discharge of individuals with acute delirium, improving outcomes.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JGS12692
National Institutes of Health - No. HL091757; No. GM076659; No. 5R01HL093234-02
Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
istex:21A896167394F21077939DD8541FFF434BC50CC9
National Institute of Aging GEMSSTAR - No. 1R03AG040706-01
ark:/67375/WNG-R5FJXZX0-X
National Institute on Aging - No. K24 AG035075
Emergency Medicine Foundation
John A. Hartford Foundation, Inc
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/jgs.12692