Fast on-rates allow short dwell time ligands to activate T cells

Two contrasting theories have emerged that attempt to describe T-cell ligand potency, one based on the t₁/₂ of the interaction and the other based on the equilibrium affinity (KD). Here, we have identified and studied an extensive set of T-cell receptor (TCR)-peptide-MHC (pMHC) interactions for CD4⁺...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 107; no. 19; pp. 8724 - 8729
Main Authors Govern, Christopher C, Paczosa, Michelle K, Chakraborty, Arup K, Huseby, Eric S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 11.05.2010
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two contrasting theories have emerged that attempt to describe T-cell ligand potency, one based on the t₁/₂ of the interaction and the other based on the equilibrium affinity (KD). Here, we have identified and studied an extensive set of T-cell receptor (TCR)-peptide-MHC (pMHC) interactions for CD4⁺ cells that have differential KDs and kinetics of binding. Our data indicate that ligands with a short t₁/₂ can be highly stimulatory if they have fast on-rates. Simple models suggest these fast kinetic ligands are stimulatory because the pMHCs bind and rebind the same TCR several times. Rebinding occurs when the TCR-pMHC on-rate outcompetes TCR-pMHC diffusion within the cell membrane, creating an aggregate t₁/₂ (ta) that can be significantly longer than a single TCR-pMHC encounter. Accounting for ta, ligand potency is KD-based when ligands have fast on-rates (kon) and t₁/₂-dependent when they have slow kon. Thus, TCR-pMHC kon allow high-affinity short t₁/₂ ligands to follow a kinetic proofreading model.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by K. Christopher Garcia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and accepted by the Editorial Board March 29, 2010 (received for review January 27, 2010)
Author contributions: C.C.G., A.K.C., and E.S.H. designed research; C.C.G., M.K.P., and E.S.H. performed research; C.C.G. and E.S.H. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; C.C.G., A.K.C., and E.S.H. analyzed data; and C.C.G., A.K.C., and E.S.H. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1000966107