Role of Posture, Magnification, and Grip Force on Microscopic Accuracy

• Published in: Annals of biomedical engineering Vol. 37; no. 5; pp. 997 - 1006
• Main Authors: Safwat, Basil, Su, Eileen L. M, Gassert, Roger, Teo, Chee Leong, Burdet, Etienne
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston Boston : Springer US 01.05.2009; Springer US; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adult; Biochemistry; Biological and Medical Physics; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Biomedicine; Biophysics; Classical Mechanics; Fatigue - physiopathology; Feedback; Hand Strength; Humans; Male; Microsurgery - methods; Posture; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Task Performance and Analysis; Tremor - physiopathology; Accuracy; Microscopy; Grip force; Manipulation; Microsurgery; Magnification; Posture
• ISSN: 0090-6964; 1573-9686
• DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9664-7

While tremor has been studied extensively, the investigations thus far do not give detailed information on how the accuracy necessary for micromanipulations is affected while performing tasks in microsurgery and the life sciences. This paper systematically studies the effects of visual feedback, posture and grip force on the trial error and tremor intensity of subjects holding a forceps-like object to perform a pointing task. Results indicate that: (i) Arm support improves accuracy in tasks requiring fine manipulation and reduces tremor intensity in the 2-8 Hz region, but hand support does not provide the same effect; hence freedom of wrist movement can be retained without a significant increase in trial error. (ii) Magnification of up to x10 is critical to carry out accurate micromanipulations, but beyond that level, magnification is not the most important factor. (iii) While an appropriate grip force must be learned in order to grasp micro-objects, such as a needle, without damaging them, the level of grip force applied does not affect the endpoint accuracy.