Rethinking ecosystem service indicators for their application to intermittent rivers
[Display omitted] •Intermittent rivers provide numerous ecosystem services.•This study provide 133 indicators to evaluate IRES ecosystem services.•A subset of indicators was applied to two Mediterranean rivers.•Ecosystem services provision strongly depended on hydrological phases.•This new framework...
Saved in:
Published in | Ecological indicators Vol. 137; p. 108693 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.04.2022
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•Intermittent rivers provide numerous ecosystem services.•This study provide 133 indicators to evaluate IRES ecosystem services.•A subset of indicators was applied to two Mediterranean rivers.•Ecosystem services provision strongly depended on hydrological phases.•This new framework can improve the management and restoration of IRES.
In these times of strong pressure on aquatic ecosystems and water resources due to climate change and water abstraction, intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES) (rivers that periodically cease to flow and/or dry) have become valuable assets. Indeed, not only do they supply water but they also offer services for humanity. Despite a growing recognition towards IRES, information for assessing their ecosystem services (ES) remains scarce. In a first step, an international interdisciplinary group of researchers developed a methodological framework to acknowledge ES provided by IRES using 109 indicators. A subset of selected ES indicators was then applied to two case studies: the Rio Seco in the Algarve (Portugal) and the Giofyros River in Crete (Greece). This paper discusses the applicability of these indicators, including the temporal and spatial variability of IRES flow regimes. Aspects of the framework, such as the methods and time required for data collection, the nature (demand or supply) and functionality of each indicator are discussed. The new framework accounts for flow intermittence in ES analyses and can help scientists and water managers to i) increase the ease and justification for IRES use in management approaches and ii) improve their conservation and restoration with a comprehensive set of appropriate indicators for IRES. In addition, the comprehensive nature of the proposed indicators ensures that they can be understood by a broad audience and easily applicable. Since they were designed through a public participation process, the setting has been prepared for holistic stakeholder analysis and education around IRES functions and associated ES. From a management point of view, it would be particularly relevant to perform an economic evaluation with this new framework to understand the value of each ES category and their trade-offs. For the scientific community, however, it is important to consider public preferences to design socially accepted policies. The proposed indicators can successfully bridge these elements, hereby establishing a solid basis for the assessment of ES provided by IRES. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-160X 1872-7034 1872-7034 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108693 |