Errors detected during physics plan review for external beam radiotherapy

• Published in: Physics and imaging in radiation oncology Vol. 24; pp. 53 - 58
• Main Authors: Siebert, Frank-André, Hirt, Markus, Delaperrière, Marc, Dunst, Jürgen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.10.2022; Elsevier
• Subjects: Error detection; Original; Quality assurance; Radiotherapy; Review process; Risk management; Review process; Error detection; Quality assurance; Radiotherapy; Risk management
• ISSN: 2405-6316; 2405-6316
• DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.09.006

Risk management in radiotherapy is of high importance. There is not much data published on errors occurring in the treatment planning process of external beam techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate errors occurring during physics plan review in external beam radiotherapy. Over a period of 14 months errors observed during the physical review process are reported. The errors were grouped and evaluated regarding treatment machine, technique, and treatment site. In addition, a correlation between frequency of errors and staff shortage was analyzed. Subgroups of grave errors (g-errors) and slight errors (s-errors) were defined to consider the different impact on the patient and clinical workflow of the errors. In 1056 plans reviewed, 110 errors (41 g-errors, 69 s-errors) were detected. The most common g-errors and s-errors were “Wrong gantry angle at setup field” (n = 19) and “Wrong field label” (n = 24), respectively. A correlation of number of errors and treatment machine, technique, or anatomical site could not be found. No correlation between staff shortage and number of errors was observed. The process of reviewing treatment plans is a relevant topic to consider in risk analysis of the radiotherapy workflow. The review process could be improved by enhancements in the treatment planning systems, use of digital dose prescription, and treatment planning templates.