Effects of temperature and biomass concentration on the performance of anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treating low strength wastewater
The studies were carried out with simulated domestic wastewater (300±10 and 500 mg COD/L) and real domestic wastewater (290±10 mg COD/L). During these studies different organic loading rates (0.29, 0.82 and 1.1 kg COD/m 3d for Set I and Set II, and 0.29 and 0.62 kg COD/m 3d for Set III), hydraulic r...
Saved in:
Published in | Desalination Vol. 278; no. 1; pp. 77 - 83 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2011
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The studies were carried out with simulated domestic wastewater (300±10 and 500
mg
COD/L) and real domestic wastewater (290±10
mg
COD/L). During these studies different organic loading rates (0.29, 0.82 and 1.1
kg
COD/m
3d for Set I and Set II, and 0.29 and 0.62
kg
COD/m
3d for Set III), hydraulic retention times (11, 15, 25
h), temperatures (10, 15, 25
°C) and at different anaerobic sludge concentrations (about 5, 10
g
VSS/L) in the reactor were applied and the performance of the reactor was tested. It was observed that treatment of low strength wastewaters under low temperature was possible. Even at the lowest temperature applied and lowest sludge amount the total organic matter (COD) removal was 65.2%. However, the COD removal and methane production decreased with decreasing temperature and HRT. The COD removal efficiencies decreased when the system was fed with settled real domestic wastewater probably due to more complex structure of the domestic wastewater and the presence of suspended solids even in small concentrations. These results showed that the ASBR process can be used for treatment of low strength wastewaters at low temperatures.
► Anaerobic sequential batch reactor is a promising treatment alternative for domestic wastewater, and can be operated effectively under low temperatures. ► The system achieved high COD removal efficiency (> 93%) at 9.6±0.4 gVSS/L. ► But, at 5.3±0.2 g VSS/L, the system performance decreased to 33%. ► Longer hydraulic retention time and cycle time were required at lower operational temperatures (>15 °C) and lower reactor VSS content. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.011 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0011-9164 1873-4464 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.011 |