Triboelectric Nanogenerator versus Piezoelectric Generator at Low Frequency (<4 Hz): A Quantitative Comparison

• Published in: iScience Vol. 23; no. 7; p. 101286
• Main Authors: Ahmed, Abdelsalam, Hassan, Islam, Helal, Ahmed S., Sencadas, Vitor, Radhi, Ali, Jeong, Chang Kyu, El-Kady, Maher F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 24.07.2020; Elsevier
• Subjects: Energy Application; Energy Resources; Nanomaterials; Nanotechnology; Nanomaterials; Energy Application; Energy Resources; Nanotechnology
• ISSN: 2589-0042; 2589-0042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101286

Triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) and piezoelectric generators (PGs) are generally considered the two most common approaches for harvesting ambient mechanical energy that is ubiquitous in our everyday life. The main difference between the two generators lies in their respective working frequency range. Despite the remarkable progress, there has been no quantitative studies on the operating frequency band of the two generators at frequency values below 4 Hz, typical of human motion. Here, the two generators are systematically compared based on their energy harvesting capabilities below 4 Hz. Unlike PGs, the TENG demonstrates higher power performance and is almost independent of the operating frequency, making it highly efficient for multi-frequency operation. In addition, PGs were shown to be inapplicable for charging capacitors when a rectifier was attached to the system. The results of this work reveal the tremendous potential of flexible TENGs for harvesting energy at low frequency. [Display omitted] •This work presents a systematic comparative study between PGs and TENGs below 4 Hz•Unlike PGs, the TENG demonstrates higher power performance at low-frequency range•Also, PGs was shown to be inapplicable for charging capacitors when a rectifier was used•This work reveals the tremendous potential of TENGs as an energy harvester Nanotechnology; Energy Resources; Energy Application; Nanomaterials