Definitive chemoradiotherapy with low-dose continuous 5-fluorouracil reduces hematological toxicity without compromising survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
To compare chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with low-dose continuous 5-fluorouracil (5FU) to CRT with 5FU+cisplatin (CDDP) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in a retrospective cohort study. We reviewed the cases of Stage I–IV ESCC patients who underwent definitive CRT in 2000–2014. Concomitant ch...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical and translational radiation oncology Vol. 9; no. C; pp. 12 - 17 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ireland
Elsevier B.V
01.02.2018
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To compare chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with low-dose continuous 5-fluorouracil (5FU) to CRT with 5FU+cisplatin (CDDP) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in a retrospective cohort study.
We reviewed the cases of Stage I–IV ESCC patients who underwent definitive CRT in 2000–2014. Concomitant chemotherapy was one of the three regimens: (1) high-dose intermittent 5FU and CDDP (standard-dose FP: SDFP), (2) low-dose continuous 5FU and CDDP (LDFP), or (3) low-dose continuous 5FU (LD5FU). The general selection criteria for chemotherapy were: SDFP for patients aged <70 yrs; LDFP for those aged 70–74 yrs; LD5FU for those aged ≥75 yrs or with performance status (PS) ≥3. Propensity scores were derived with chemotherapy (LD5FU vs. 5FU+CDDP) as the dependent variable.
In a multivariate analysis, chemotherapy (LD5FU vs. SDFP, p = .24; LDFP vs. SDFP, p = .52) did not affect the overall survival (OS). LD5FU caused significantly less grade 3–4 leukopenia (9%) compared to SDFP (47%) and LDFP (44%) (p < .001). In a propensity-matched analysis, LD5FU affected neither OS (HR 1.06; 95%CI 0.55–2.05; p = .87) nor progression-free survival (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.50–1.81; p = .87).
CRT with low-dose continuous 5FU may be a less toxic option for elderly ESCC patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2405-6308 2405-6308 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.12.003 |