Effect of platelet-rich fibrin on epidural fibrosis and comparison to ADCON® Gel and hyaluronic acid

In this experimental study, PRF (Platelet Rich Fibrin), HA (Hyaluronic Acid) gel and ADCON® Gel were compared in terms of preventing epidural fibrosis. Twenty-eight Sprague–Dawley rats (mean weight, 400–450 g) were divided into 4 groups. L3-L4 laminectomy was performed in each group. Following lamin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica Vol. 52; no. 6; pp. 469 - 474
Main Authors Demirel, Esra, Yildiz, Kadri, Çadirci, Kenan, Aygün, Hayati, Şenocak, Eyüp, Gündoğdu, Betül
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Turkey Elsevier B.V 01.11.2018
Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
AVES
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this experimental study, PRF (Platelet Rich Fibrin), HA (Hyaluronic Acid) gel and ADCON® Gel were compared in terms of preventing epidural fibrosis. Twenty-eight Sprague–Dawley rats (mean weight, 400–450 g) were divided into 4 groups. L3-L4 laminectomy was performed in each group. Following laminectomy, Adcon® Gel, HA gel and PRF were applied onto the surgery site locally in Group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Group 4 was maintained as control without any local application. After five weeks, L3-L4 vertebrae were removed totally and taken to histopathological evaluation for epidural fibrosis, acute inflammatory cell density, chronic inflammatory cell density, hemorrhage, angiogenesis and new bone formation. Acute inflammation cell density, angiogenesis, and new bone formation levels were comparable among the study groups (p > 0.05). However, new bone formation was higher in the PRF group. Epidural fibrosis and chronic inflammatory cell density were significantly lower in the PRF group (p < 0.05). We concluded that PRF contributed to hemostasis and prevented epidural fibrosis.
ISSN:1017-995X
2589-1294
DOI:10.1016/j.aott.2018.07.005