Semantic similarities between a keyword database and a controlled vocabulary database: An investigation in the antibiotic resistance literature
The KeyWords Plus in the Science Citation Index database represents an approach to combining citation and semantic indexing in describing the document content. This paper explores the similarities or dissimilarities between citation‐semantic and analytic indexing. The dataset consisted of over 400 m...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Society for Information Science Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 166 - 180 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
2000
John Wiley & Sons American Documentation Institute Wiley Periodicals Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0002-8231 2330-1635 1097-4571 2330-1643 |
DOI | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<166::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-Z |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The KeyWords Plus in the Science Citation Index database represents an approach to combining citation and semantic indexing in describing the document content. This paper explores the similarities or dissimilarities between citation‐semantic and analytic indexing. The dataset consisted of over 400 matching records in the SCI and MEDLINE databases on antibiotic resistance in pneumonia. The degree of similarity in indexing terms was found to vary on a scale from completely different to completely identical with various levels in between. The within‐document similarity in the two databases was measured by a variation on the Jaccard Coefficient—the Inclusion Index. The average inclusion coefficient was 0.4134 for SCI and 0.3371 for MEDLINE. The 20 terms occurring most frequently in each database were identified. The two groups of terms shared the same terms that consist of the “intellectual base” for the subject. Conceptual similarity was analyzed through scatterplots of matching and nonmatching terms vs. partially identical and broader/narrower terms. The study also found that both databases differed in assigning terms in various semantic categories. Implications of this research and further studies are suggested. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:B07FBBC64911E3BCC011EDEAF1832EE7D665886B ArticleID:ASI8 ark:/67375/WNG-C7DN3TGL-4 Institute for Scientific Information Citation Research Grant 1997 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-8231 2330-1635 1097-4571 2330-1643 |
DOI: | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<166::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-Z |