Latitudinal phytoplankton distribution and the neutral theory of biodiversity

• Published in: Global ecology and biogeography Vol. 22; no. 5; pp. 531 - 543
• Main Authors: Chust, Guillem, Irigoien, Xabier, Chave, Jerome, Harris, Roger P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2013; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Blackwell; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Algae; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Atlantic Ocean; Bacillariophyceae; beta diversity; Biodiversity; Biogeography; Biological and medical sciences; Community structure; diatom; Diatoms; dispersal; Ecological modeling; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; Latitude; Mantels; Marine ecology; neutral theory; Phytoplankton; plankton; Plant cytology, morphology, systematics, chorology and evolution; Sea water ecosystems; Species; Synecology; Thallophyta; Atlantic Ocean; A, Atlantic; Neutral theory; Algae; Latitudinal distribution; Atlantic Ocean; Biogeography; Beta diversity; dispersal; Ecology; Biodiversity; diatom; Dispersion; Marine environment; Heterokontophyta; Bacillariophyta; Plankton; Phytoplankton
• ISSN: 1466-822X; 1466-8238; 1466-822X
• DOI: 10.1111/geb.12016

Aim: Recent studies have suggested that global diatom distributions are not limited by dispersal, in the case of both extant species and fossil species, but rather that environmental filtering explains their spatial patterns. Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity provides a framework in which to test these alternatives. Our aim is to test whether the structure of marine phytoplankton (diatoms, dinoflagellates and coccolithophores) assemblages across the Atlantic agrees with neutral theory predictions. We asked: (1) whether intersite variance in phytoplankton diversity is explained predominantly by dispersal limitation or by environmental conditions; and (2) whether species abundance distributions are consistent with those expected by the neutral model. Location: Meridional transect of the Atlantic (50° N-50° S). Methods: We estimated the relative contributions of environmental factors and geographic distance to phytoplankton composition using similarity matrices, Mantel tests and variation partitioning of the species composition based upon canonical ordination methods. We compared the species abundance distribution of phytoplankton with the neutral model using Etienne's maximum-likelihood inference method. Results: Phytoplankton communities are slightly more determined by niche segregation (24%), than by dispersal limitation and ecological drift (17%). In 60% of communities, the assumption of neutrality in species' abundance distributions could not be rejected. In tropical zones, where oceanic gyres enclose large stable water masses, most communities showed low species immigration rates; in contrast, we infer that communities in temperate areas, out of oligotrophic gyres, have higher rates of species immigration. Conclusions: Phytoplankton community structure is consistent with partial niche assembly and partial dispersal and drift assembly (neutral processes). The role of dispersal limitation is almost as important as habitat filtering, a fact that has been largely overlooked in previous studies. Furthermore, the polewards increase in immigration rates of species that we have discovered is probably caused by water mixing conditions and productivity.