Tolerance to apical and foliar damage: costs and mechanisms in Raphanus raphanistrum

• Published in: Oikos Vol. 116; no. 12; pp. 2071 - 2081
• Main Authors: Boalt, Elin, Lehtilä, Kari
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copenhagen Copenhagen : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2007; Blackwell Publishing Ltd; Blackwell Publishing; Blackwell
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Autoecology; Biological and medical sciences; Ecological competition; Ecology; Evolution; Experiments; Flowers; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Genetic variation; Genotype & phenotype; Genotypes; Herbivores; Infestation; NATURAL SCIENCES; NATURVETENSKAP; Phenotypic traits; Plant populations; Plants; Plants and fungi; Pollen; Raphanus raphanistrum; Seeds; Costs; Genetic variability; Herbivorous; Weed; Seed production; Tolerance; Plant leaf; Experimental study; Leaf area; Plant; Phytophagous; Cruciferae; Animal plant relation; Dicotyledones; Angiospermae; Spermatophyta; Damage; Apex; Corolla; Fitness; Raphanus raphanistrum
• ISSN: 0030-1299; 1600-0706; 1600-0706
• DOI: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16056.x

To study mechanisms underlying plant tolerance to herbivore damage, we used apical and foliar damage as experimental treatments to study whether there are similar tolerance mechanisms to different types of damage. We also studied whether tolerance to different types of damage are associated, and whether there is a cost involved in plant tolerance to different types of herbivore damage. Our greenhouse experiment involved 480 plants from 30 full-sib families of an annual weed Raphanus raphanistrum, wild radish, which were subjected to control and two different simulated herbivore damage treatments, apex removal and foliar damage of 30% of leaf area. Apical damage significantly decreased seed production, whereas foliar damage had no effect. There was a significant genetic variation for tolerance to foliar, but not apical damage. No costs were observed in terms of negative correlation between tolerance to either damage type and fitness of undamaged plants. Tolerances to apical and foliar damage were not significantly correlated with each other. We observed a larger number of significant associations between tolerance and reproductive traits than between tolerance and vegetative traits. Plant height and leaf size of damaged plants interacted in their association to tolerance to foliar damage. Inflorescence number and pollen quantity per flower of damaged plants were positively associated with tolerance to apical damage. In late-flowering genotypes, petal size of undamaged plants and pollen quantity of damaged plants were positively associated with tolerance to foliar damage. In summary, traits involved in floral display and male fitness were associated with plant tolerance to herbivore damage.