Increasing the statistical power of animal experiments with historical control data

Low statistical power reduces the reliability of animal research; yet, increasing sample sizes to increase statistical power is problematic for both ethical and practical reasons. We present an alternative solution using Bayesian priors based on historical control data, which capitalizes on the obse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature neuroscience Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 470 - 477
Main Authors Bonapersona, V., Hoijtink, H., Sarabdjitsingh, R. A., Joëls, M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.04.2021
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Low statistical power reduces the reliability of animal research; yet, increasing sample sizes to increase statistical power is problematic for both ethical and practical reasons. We present an alternative solution using Bayesian priors based on historical control data, which capitalizes on the observation that control groups in general are expected to be similar to each other. In a simulation study, we show that including data from control groups of previous studies could halve the minimum sample size required to reach the canonical 80% power or increase power when using the same number of animals. We validated the approach on a dataset based on seven independent rodent studies on the cognitive effects of early-life adversity. We present an open-source tool, RePAIR, that can be widely used to apply this approach and increase statistical power, thereby improving the reliability of animal experiments. Bonapersona and colleagues describe how historical control data can be used to improve statistical power while reducing the number of animals required in experiments. They present an open-source tool, RePAIR, that can be used to apply this approach.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1097-6256
1546-1726
DOI:10.1038/s41593-020-00792-3