Difficulties in the Incorporation of Augmented Reality in University Education: Visions from the Experts

“Augmented reality” (AR) is presented as technology that harmonizes, in real time and with user collaboration, digital information with physical information through different technological supports. Such are AR possibilities, that when it is incorporated into teaching, students show high satisfactio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of new approaches in educational research Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 126 - 141
Main Authors Barroso-Osuna, Julio, Gutiérrez-Castillo, Juan Jesús, Llorente-Cejudo, Mªdel Carmen, Ortiz, Rubicelia Valencia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.07.2019
Universidad de Alicante
Nature Publishing Group
University of Alicante
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2254-7339
2254-7339
DOI10.7821/naer.2019.7.409

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:“Augmented reality” (AR) is presented as technology that harmonizes, in real time and with user collaboration, digital information with physical information through different technological supports. Such are AR possibilities, that when it is incorporated into teaching, students show high satisfaction rates and positive attitudes for its use, but at the same time, a series of limitations and obstacles can be noticed. As an attempt to investigate the technical, curricular and organizational difficulties of AR incorporation in training contexts, an instrument “AR obstacle questionnaire” (CORA) was designed, which in turn was administered to a total of 264 subject experts for validation through the Delphi method, subsequently applying the “K coefficient” ( Kc (knowledge coefficient) + Ka (argumentation coefficient)), selecting those experts who obtained a ≥ 0,8 score in the coefficient. Among the results obtained in the study we manage to point out the main obstacles involving AR implementation into university education: the lack of teacher training and improvement, the few educational experiences found, lack of conceptual foundation, limited educational research and lack of institutional support.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2254-7339
2254-7339
DOI:10.7821/naer.2019.7.409