Cathodic Protection Range of the Embedded Sacrificial Zinc Anode for RC Member Deteriorated by Carbonation and Mixed Chloride

• Published in: Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 19; no. 7; pp. 785 - 795
• Main Authors: Yoshida, Takahiro, Watanabe, Yoshihiko, Nomura, Norikazu, Aramaki, Satoshi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Tokyo Japan Concrete Institute 15.07.2021; Japan Science and Technology Agency
• Subjects: Anodic protection; Carbonation; Cathodic protection; Chloride; Chloride ions; Corrosion prevention; Depolarization; Rebar; Reinforcing steels; Sacrificial anodes; Thickness
• ISSN: 1346-8014; 1347-3913
• DOI: 10.3151/jact.19.785

Much is left unknown about applicable conditions of the method or quantification of the cathodic protection range. In particular, little has been studied about how the range or effect of cathodic protection is influenced by such factors as the thickness of reinforcing bars (rebars) to be protected, combined deterioration by carbonation and mixed chloride, amount of chloride ions and carbonation depth. This study experimentally evaluated the effect of differences in the chloride ion content in concrete, the carbonation depth or the rebar thickness on the cathodic protection range of the embedded sacrificial anode method. The results of the experiment were that the smaller the carbonation depth, the amount of chloride ions or the rebar thickness, the larger the amount of depolarization of the rebars in the concrete to be protected was. That is, for corrosion protection of rebars near patch repair areas embedded with sacrificial anodes, it would be appropriate to make the steel surface area of components smaller and the salt damage environment less corrosive.