Benefits and Challenges of Treat-to-Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 12; no. 19; p. 6292
• Main Authors: West, Jack, Tan, Katrina, Devi, Jalpa, Macrae, Finlay, Christensen, Britt, Segal, Jonathan P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 29.09.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Biomarkers; Care and treatment; Chronic illnesses; Clinical medicine; Clinical outcomes; Crohns disease; crohn’s disease; Diagnosis; Disease control; Endoscopy; Inflammatory bowel disease; Inflammatory bowel diseases; mucosal healing; Patients; Remission (Medicine); Review; Steroids; treat to target; ulcerative colitis; Australia
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196292

There is notable disparity between symptomatology and disease activity in a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and escalation of treatment based on symptoms alone can fail to significantly alter the course of disease. The STRIDE-II position statement, published in 2021 by the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) initiative of the International Organisation for the Study of IBD (IOIBD) provides the most current recommendations for a treat-to-target (T2T) approach in IBD. Despite the benefits offered by a T2T approach in IBD, there are numerous drawbacks and current limitations to its widespread implementation in real-world clinical practice. Owing to the lack of a standardised definition of MH, outcome data are heterogeneous and limit the comparability of existing data. Further, studies investigating the likelihood of achieving MH with a T2T approach are limited and largely retrospective. Evidence of the real-world feasibility of tight monitoring is currently minimal and demonstrates sub-optimal adherence among patients. Further, the few studies on the acceptability and uptake of a T2T approach in real-world practice demonstrate the need for increased acceptability on both patients’ and clinicians’ behalf. Real-world applicability is further limited by the need for repeated endoscopic assessments of MH as well as a lack of guidance on how to incorporate the various treatment targets into therapeutic decision-making. We aim to review the benefits and challenges of the T2T approach and to discuss potential solutions to further patient care.