Introducing Simple Detection of Bioavailable Arsenic at Rafaela (Santa Fe Province, Argentina) Using the ARSOlux Biosensor

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 12; no. 5; pp. 5465 - 5482
• Main Authors: Siegfried, Konrad, Hahn-Tomer, Sonja, Koelsch, Andreas, Osterwalder, Eva, Mattusch, Juergen, Staerk, Hans-Joachim, Meichtry, Jorge M, De Seta, Graciela E, Reina, Fernando D, Panigatti, Cecilia, Litter, Marta I, Harms, Hauke
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 21.05.2015; MDPI
• Subjects: Argentina; Arsenic; Arsenic - analysis; Biosensing Techniques; Biosensors; Drinking water; Fluorides - analysis; Groundwater; Groundwater - analysis; Phosphates; Water - chemistry; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis; Water Supply; Argentina; Chaco Pampean plain; ground water; Argentina; biosensor; bioavailable arsenic
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120505465

Numerous articles have reported the occurrence of arsenic in drinking water in Argentina, and the resulting health effects in severely affected regions of the country. Arsenic in drinking water in Argentina is largely naturally occurring due to elevated background content of the metalloid in volcanic sediments, although, in some regions, mining can contribute. While the origin of arsenic release has been discussed extensively, the problem of drinking water contamination has not yet been solved. One key step in progress towards mitigation of problems related with the consumption of As-containing water is the availability of simple detection tools. A chemical test kit and the ARSOlux biosensor were evaluated as simple analytical tools for field measurements of arsenic in the groundwater of Rafaela (Santa Fe, Argentina), and the results were compared with ICP-MS and HPLC-ICP-MS measurements. A survey of the groundwater chemistry was performed to evaluate possible interferences with the field tests. The results showed that the ARSOlux biosensor performed better than the chemical field test, that the predominant species of arsenic in the study area was arsenate and that arsenic concentration in the studied samples had a positive correlation with fluoride and vanadium, and a negative one with calcium and iron.