The new educational project Televascular Games during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic

• Published in: Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 638 - 645
• Main Authors: Chisci, Emiliano, Parlani, Gianbattista, Gatta, Emanuele, Isernia, Giacomo, de Donato, Gianmarco, Antonello, Michele, Simonte, Gioele, Kölbel, Tilo, Bertoglio, Luca, Yeung, Kak Khee, Donas, Konstantinos, Fazzini, Stefano, Dias, Nuno, Michelagnoli, Stefano
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.12.2022; Elsevier
• Subjects: Aneurysm; Aortic dissection; Clinical Medicine; Education; Educational Sciences; Kirurgi; Klinisk medicin; Medical and Health Sciences; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Samhällsvetenskap; Social Sciences; Surgery; Teleconsultation; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Thoraco-abdominal aortic disease; Training; Utbildningsvetenskap; Teleconsultation; Training; Telemedicine; Telehealth; Education; Aneurysm; Aortic dissection; Thoraco-abdominal aortic disease
• ISSN: 2468-4287; 2468-4287
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.05.019

To report methodology and first-year results of a new educational project called Televascular Games,” which took place during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Complex aneurysmal aortic disease was discussed during a 2-hour competition webinar, according to three modalities. (1) Planning case competition (PCC): Two to four preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of an already performed selected case were submitted for the competition. CTA scans were uploaded anonymously, without any reference to the center or the surgeon who performed the case. The competitor had to prepare a presentation of how he or she would have diagnosed, sized, planned, treated, and followed up the case, of the medical therapy and of the bail-out maneuvers. (2) Challenging case competition (CCC): The competitor elaborates a presentation of an already treated case concerning an aortic topic and discusses sizing, planning, treatment, possible bail-out maneuvers and obtained results. For the CCC and PCC, the competitors with the best score were preselected to present and discuss their plan during the webinars. (3) Quiz competition: Two to six CTA scans of already performed selected aortic cases were submitted for the competition. A quiz with multiple choice questions was answered by the competitors. The top four competitors were selected for the webinars and then they discussed the cases during the webinar. Finally, at the end of the case discussion, the effective case resolution and follow-up were shown. A final winner was voted via televoting, based on six preestablished criteria. The project was endorsed by different national and international societies. Between October 2020 and December 2021, there were 12 Italian and 1 international webinars with 1695 participants overall (mean, 130; range, 86-177). Competitors were 54 years of age (mean, 27 years; range, 22-38 years). Two editions were CCCs, two quiz competitions, and nine PCCs. The reliability of the interobserver sizing of competitors was κ = 0.43 and κ = 0.62 for the proximal and distal sealing measurements respectively and very good (κ = 0.88-0.95) in the evaluation of orientation of the vessels, presence of angulations, calcifications, and thrombus. The sizing discrepancy resulted in a significant variability of the planning (κ = 0.45). The project ranked 9.6 on a 10-point rating scale by all the participants and competitors. The formula of gaming and collegial discussion of aortic cases herein reported has proved valid and attractive during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period. The variability of the results on sizing and planning suggested to confer with a second opinion, especially for less experienced surgeons.