An operational approach to National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease

Objective: A workgroup commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association (AA) and the National Institute on Aging (NIA) recently published research criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD). We performed a preliminary assessment of these guidelines. Methods: We employed Pittsburgh compound B po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of neurology Vol. 71; no. 6; pp. 765 - 775
Main Authors Jack Jr, Clifford R., Knopman, David S., Weigand, Stephen D., Wiste, Heather J., Vemuri, Prashanthi, Lowe, Val, Kantarci, Kejal, Gunter, Jeffrey L., Senjem, Matthew L., Ivnik, Robert J., Roberts, Rosebud O., Rocca, Walter A., Boeve, Bradley F., Petersen, Ronald C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.06.2012
Wiley-Liss
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: A workgroup commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association (AA) and the National Institute on Aging (NIA) recently published research criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD). We performed a preliminary assessment of these guidelines. Methods: We employed Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (PET) imaging as our biomarker of cerebral amyloidosis, and 18fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging and hippocampal volume as biomarkers of neurodegeneration. A group of 42 clinically diagnosed AD subjects was used to create imaging biomarker cutpoints. A group of 450 cognitively normal (CN) subjects from a population‐based sample was used to develop cognitive cutpoints and to assess population frequencies of the different preclinical AD stages using different cutpoint criteria. Results: The new criteria subdivide the preclinical phase of AD into stages 1 to 3. To classify our CN subjects, 2 additional categories were needed. Stage 0 denotes subjects with normal AD biomarkers and no evidence of subtle cognitive impairment. Suspected non‐AD pathophysiology (SNAP) denotes subjects with normal amyloid PET imaging, but abnormal neurodegeneration biomarker studies. At fixed cutpoints corresponding to 90% sensitivity for diagnosing AD and the 10th percentile of CN cognitive scores, 43% of our sample was classified as stage 0, 16% stage 1, 12 % stage 2, 3% stage 3, and 23% SNAP. Interpretation: This cross‐sectional evaluation of the NIA‐AA criteria for preclinical AD indicates that the 1–3 staging criteria coupled with stage 0 and SNAP categories classify 97% of CN subjects from a population‐based sample, leaving only 3% unclassified. Future longitudinal validation of the criteria will be important ANN NEUROL 2012;
Bibliography:NIH/National Institute on Aging - No. R01 AG11378; No. U01 AG006786; No. P50 AG16574; No. C06 RR018898
ArticleID:ANA22628
ark:/67375/WNG-TSB25X3M-C
istex:802930EF123841497EA56C8247B3C65774CCEFD5
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0364-5134
1531-8249
1531-8249
DOI:10.1002/ana.22628