Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Surface Flow and Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands Treating Dairy Wastewater

Agricultural wastewater treatment is important for protecting water quality in rural ecosystems, and constructed wetlands are an effective treatment option. During treatment, however, some C and N are converted to CH4, N2O, respectively, which are potent greenhouse gases (GHGs). The objective of thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of environmental quality Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 460 - 471
Main Authors VanderZaag, A.C, Gordon, R.J, Burton, D.L, Jamieson, R.C, Stratton, G.W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Madison American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society 01.03.2010
American Society of Agronomy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Agricultural wastewater treatment is important for protecting water quality in rural ecosystems, and constructed wetlands are an effective treatment option. During treatment, however, some C and N are converted to CH4, N2O, respectively, which are potent greenhouse gases (GHGs). The objective of this study was to assess CH4, N2O, and CO2 emissions from surface flow (SF) and subsurface flow (SSF) constructed wetlands. Six constructed wetlands (three SF and three SSF; 6.6 m2 each) were loaded with dairy wastewater in Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada. From August 2005 through September 2006, GHG fluxes were measured continuously using transparent steady-state chambers that encompassed the entire wetlands. Flux densities of all gases were significantly (p < 0.01) different between SF and SSF wetlands changed significantly with time. Overall, SF wetlands had significantly (p < 0.01) higher emissions of CH4 N2O than SSF wetlands and therefore had 180% higher total GHG emissions. The ratio of N2O to CH4 emissions (CO2–equivalent) was nearly 1:1 in both wetland types. Emissions of CH4–C as a percentage of C removal varied seasonally from 0.2 to 27% were 2 to 3x higher in SF than SSF wetlands. The ratio of N2O–N emitted to N removed was between 0.1 and 1.6%, and the difference between wetland types was inconsistent. Thus, N2O emissions had a similar contribution to N removal in both wetland types, but SSF wetlands emitted less CH4 while removing more C from the wastewater than SF wetlands.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0166
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0047-2425
1537-2537
DOI:10.2134/jeq2009.0166