How ethical is your clinical trial?
Is Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and a rigorous informed consent process enough? It is our view that this is no longer the case. Conventional research ethics emphasise the importance of weighing the risks and benefits for prospective participants as one of the key determinants of deeming...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of clinical practice (Esher) Vol. 64; no. 9; pp. 1179 - 1182 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.08.2010
Wiley-Blackwell Hindawi Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Is Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and a rigorous informed consent process enough? It is our view that this is no longer the case. Conventional research ethics emphasise the importance of weighing the risks and benefits for prospective participants as one of the key determinants of deeming a clinical trial ethical. We support the notion that ethical obligations of research should include considerations not only at the individual level, but also at the community level (
1
,
2
). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:IJCP2421 istex:98C3D5FCE5F36CA5AFACFBF0D250B7DB3CEC06EC ark:/67375/WNG-GSK84VWX-G http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/authorresources/onlineopen.html Re‐use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/authorresources/onlineopen.html |
ISSN: | 1368-5031 1742-1241 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02421.x |