Chilling outweighs photoperiod in preventing precocious spring development

It is well known that increased spring temperatures cause earlier onset dates of leaf unfolding and flowering. However, a temperature increase in winter may be associated with delayed development when species' chilling requirements are not fulfilled. Furthermore, photosensitivity is supposed to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal change biology Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 170 - 182
Main Authors Laube, Julia, Sparks, Tim H., Estrella, Nicole, Höfler, Josef, Ankerst, Donna P., Menzel, Annette
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2014
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is well known that increased spring temperatures cause earlier onset dates of leaf unfolding and flowering. However, a temperature increase in winter may be associated with delayed development when species' chilling requirements are not fulfilled. Furthermore, photosensitivity is supposed to interfere with temperature triggers. To date, neither the relative importance nor possible interactions of these three factors have been elucidated. In this study, we present a multispecies climate chamber experiment to test the effects of chilling and photoperiod on the spring phenology of 36 woody species. Several hypotheses regarding their variation with species traits (successional strategy, floristic status, climate of their native range) were tested. Long photoperiods advanced budburst for one‐third of the studied species, but magnitudes of these effects were generally minor. In contrast to prior hypotheses, photosensitive responses were not restricted to climax or oceanic species. Increased chilling length advanced budburst for almost all species; its effect greatly exceeding that of photoperiod. Moreover, we suggest that photosensitivity and chilling effects have to be rigorously disentangled, as the response to photoperiod was restricted to individuals that had not been fully chilled. The results indicate that temperature requirements and successional strategy are linked, with climax species having higher chilling and forcing requirements than pioneer species. Temperature requirements of invasive species closely matched those of native species, suggesting that high phenological concordance is a prerequisite for successful establishment. Lack of chilling not only led to a considerable delay in budburst but also caused substantial changes in the chronological order of species' budburst. The results reveal that increased winter temperatures might impact forest ecosystems more than formerly assumed. Species with lower chilling requirements, such as pioneer or invasive species, might profit from warming winters, if late spring frost events would in parallel occur earlier.
Bibliography:European Union's Seventh Framework Programme - No. FP7/2007-2013; No. 282250
European Research Council
ark:/67375/WNG-QGW3QQL6-W
istex:876C51A25F3670565BA2D9D1837B26FC38B656B1
Figure S1. Temperatures/day lengths before the three cutting dates. Figure S2. Survival curves for single species. Figure S3. Survival curves for different groupings of species. Figure S4. Number of chill days under field conditions (Freising 1972-2001) in comparison to the winter of the experiment (2011/2012). Figure S5. Median number of days until budburst for all treatments. Table S1. Species description. Table S2. Species classification into ecological groups. Table S3. Mean values of the assigned successional strategies. Table S4. Significant effects of chilling and photoperiod treatments on species' ability to reach budburst. Table S5. Treatment effects on different groups of species, P-values adjusted for multiple comparisons. Table S6. Comparison of species' chronological order to budburst under experimental vs. field conditions.
ArticleID:GCB12360
German Excellence Initiative
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ISSN:1354-1013
1365-2486
1365-2486
DOI:10.1111/gcb.12360