No Differences in Value-Based Decision-Making Due to Use of Oral Contraceptives

Fluctuating ovarian hormones have been shown to affect decision-making processes in women. While emerging evidence suggests effects of endogenous ovarian hormones such as estradiol and progesterone on value-based decision-making in women, the impact of exogenous synthetic hormones, as in most oral c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) Vol. 13; p. 817825
Main Authors Lewis, Carolin A, Kimmig, Ann-Christin S, Kroemer, Nils B, Pooseh, Shakoor, Smolka, Michael N, Sacher, Julia, Derntl, Birgit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 22.04.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fluctuating ovarian hormones have been shown to affect decision-making processes in women. While emerging evidence suggests effects of endogenous ovarian hormones such as estradiol and progesterone on value-based decision-making in women, the impact of exogenous synthetic hormones, as in most oral contraceptives, is not clear. In a between-subjects design, we assessed measures of value-based decision-making in three groups of women aged 18 to 29 years, during (1) active oral contraceptive intake (N = 22), (2) the early follicular phase of the natural menstrual cycle (N = 20), and (3) the periovulatory phase of the natural menstrual cycle (N = 20). Estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, and sex-hormone binding globulin levels were assessed in all groups blood samples. We used a test battery which measured different facets of value-based decision-making: delay discounting, risk-aversion, risk-seeking, and loss aversion. While hormonal levels did show the expected patterns for the three groups, there were no differences in value-based decision-making parameters. Consequently, Bayes factors showed conclusive evidence in support of the null hypothesis. We conclude that women on oral contraceptives show no differences in value-based decision-making compared to the early follicular and periovulatory natural menstrual cycle phases.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Janine Bayer, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Laura A. Pritschet, University of California, Santa Barbara, United States
This article was submitted to Neuroendocrine Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology
Edited by: Rachida Guennoun, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France
ISSN:1664-2392
1664-2392
DOI:10.3389/fendo.2022.817825