Midterm results of endovascular treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection

Objectives The operative mortality and morbidity of patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection remain high. The endovascular approach has been proposed as a potential alternative. The purpose of this study is to review the contemporary outcome of patients undergoing endovascular treatm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 138; no. 3; pp. 625 - 631
Main Authors Khoynezhad, Ali, MD, Donayre, Carlos E., MD, Omari, Bassam O., MD, Kopchok, George E., BS, Walot, Irwin, MD, White, Rodney A., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.09.2009
AATS/WTSA
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives The operative mortality and morbidity of patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection remain high. The endovascular approach has been proposed as a potential alternative. The purpose of this study is to review the contemporary outcome of patients undergoing endovascular treatment for complicated acute type B aortic dissection. Methods A retrospective analysis of 28 patients undergoing endovascular interventions for acute type B aortic dissection was performed. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used for statistical computation. Results Indications for emergency endografting were rupture in 4 (14%) patients, severe lower body malperfusion in 8 (29%) patients, visceral/renal malperfusion in 7 (25%) patients, persistent chest pain despite proper anti-impulsive therapy in 5 (18%) patients, uncontrollable hypertension in 1 (4%) patient, and acute dilatation of false lumen with impending rupture in 3 (11%) patients. Three (11%) patients died early. Three patients died during follow-up of non–aorta-related causes. Overall survival was 82% and 78% at 1 and 5 years' follow-up, respectively. The aorta-related mortality was 10% for the entire follow-up period. Complete thrombosis of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was achieved in 22 (85%) members of the surviving cohort, and partial thrombosis was achieved in the remainder. The rate of treatment failure according to Stanford criteria was 18% at 5 years. Mean follow-up was 36 months, and follow-up was complete in 28 (100%) patients. Conclusions Thoracic aortic endografting for complicated acute type B aortic dissection can be performed with a relatively low postoperative morbidity and mortality in experienced hands. The endovascular approach to life-threatening complications of acute type B aortic dissection appears to have a favorable outcome in midterm follow-up.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.044