Association between Growth Differentiation Factor 15 and Non-Dipping Circadian Pattern in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Essential Hypertension

Objective: Non-dipper hypertension (HT) confers greater risk compared with dipper HT. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) recently emerged as a novel and independent marker of cardiovascular disease, both in diagnostic and prognostic scopes. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship of circadia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical principles and practice Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 566 - 572
Main Authors Sökmen, Erdoğan, Uçar, Cahit, Sivri, Serkan, Çelik, Mustafa, Boduroğlu, Yalçın, Erer, Murat, Yıldırım, Alp, İlanbey, Bilal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel, Switzerland S. Karger AG 01.11.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Non-dipper hypertension (HT) confers greater risk compared with dipper HT. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) recently emerged as a novel and independent marker of cardiovascular disease, both in diagnostic and prognostic scopes. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship of circadian blood pressure (BP) pattern with serum GDF-15 level in newly diagnosed HT patients without left ventricular hypertrophy. Subjects and Methods: Newly diagnosed non-dipper (n = 66) and dipper (n = 60) HT patients were selected according to 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The controls comprised healthy normotensive subjects (n = 31). Data was collected through physical examination, laboratory analysis, ABPM, and echocardiography. GDF-15 was measured using ELISA. Results: Greater GDF-15 level was found in the non-dippers compared with the dippers and the controls (557.53 ± 91.7, 513.79 ± 62.86, and 494.44 ± 79.30 ng/L, respectively, p < 0.001). In bivariate linear correlation analysis, GDF-15 correlated positively with glomerular filtration rate (r = 0.180, p =0.030), total cholesterol (r = 0.170, p = 0.038), septal E/E′ ratio (r = 0.344, p = 0.001), lateral E/E′ ratio (r = 0.366, p < 0.001), nighttime systolic BP (r = 0.166, p = 0.046), and nighttime diastolic BP (r = 0.188, p = 0.024); however, it correlated negatively with septal and lateral E′ velocities (r = 0.268, p = 0.005 and r = 0.236, p = 0.013, respectively). Furthermore, GDF-15 level and nighttime diastolic BP remained independently associated with non-dipper HT. In ROC analysis, optimal cutoff value for GDF-15 was 524.6 ng/L with 56.7% sensitivity and 72.4% specificity (AUC: 0.676, 95% CI: 0.580–0.772, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our results showed GDF-15 upregulation in the non-dipper HT group. GDF-15 and nighttime diastolic BP were independently associated with the non-dipping pattern. This study may suggest possible utilization of GDF-15 in the prediction of non-dipper HT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1011-7571
1423-0151
DOI:10.1159/000501096