Signal amplification of padlock probes by rolling circle replication

Circularizing oligonucleotide probes (padlock probes) have the potential to detect sets of gene sequences with high specificity and excellent selectivity for sequence variants, but sensitivity of detection has been limiting. By using a rolling circle replication (RCR) mechanism, circularized but not...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNucleic acids research Vol. 26; no. 22; pp. 5073 - 5078
Main Authors Banér, Johan, Nilsson, Mats, Mendel-Hartvig, Maritha, Landegren, Ulf
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 15.11.1998
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Circularizing oligonucleotide probes (padlock probes) have the potential to detect sets of gene sequences with high specificity and excellent selectivity for sequence variants, but sensitivity of detection has been limiting. By using a rolling circle replication (RCR) mechanism, circularized but not unreacted probes can yield a powerful signal amplification. We demonstrate here that in order for the reaction to proceed efficiently, the probes must be released from the topological link that forms with target molecules upon hybridization and ligation. If the target strand has a nearby free 3′ end, then the probe-target hybrids can be displaced by the polymerase used for replication. The displaced probe can then slip off the target strand and a rolling circle amplification is initiated. Alternatively, the target sequence itself can prime an RCR after its non-base paired 3′ end has been removed by exonucleolytic activity. We found the Φ29 DNA polymerase to be superior to the Klenow fragment in displacing the target DNA strand, and it maintained the polymerization reaction for at least 12 h, yielding an extension product that represents several thousand-fold the length of the padlock probe.
Bibliography:istex:D368E8B3B79029A306C6DB96E60599951C8D11DD
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors
ark:/67375/HXZ-Q3VV0RLN-X
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0305-1048
1362-4962
DOI:10.1093/nar/26.22.5073