A clinical comparison of remifentanil or alfentanil in propofol-anesthetized cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy

Sixteen cats were used to compare the cardiovascular and anesthetic effects of remifentanil (REMI) or alfentanil (ALF) in propofol-anesthetized cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. After premedication with acepromazine, anesthesia was induced and maintained with a constant rate infusion of propofol (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of feline medicine and surgery Vol. 13; no. 10; pp. 738 - 743
Main Authors Padilha, Samanta T., Steagall, Paulo V.M., Monteiro, Beatriz P., Kahvegian, Marcia A.P., Ubukata, Rodrigo, Rodrigues, Edilberto O., Rosa, Andre Leguthe, Aguiar, Antonio J.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2011
SAGE Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Sixteen cats were used to compare the cardiovascular and anesthetic effects of remifentanil (REMI) or alfentanil (ALF) in propofol-anesthetized cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. After premedication with acepromazine, anesthesia was induced and maintained with a constant rate infusion of propofol (0.3 mg/kg/min). REMI or ALF infusions were administered simultaneously with propofol. Heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), pulse oximetry (SpO 2), rectal temperature (RT), and response to surgical stimulation were recorded at predefined time points during anesthesia. Data [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures followed by a Dunnett’s test and Student t-test ( P < 0.05). SAP was significantly lower in ALF group than in REMI group. Extubation time was significantly shorter in REMI than in ALF group. Overall infusion rate of REMI and ALF was 0.24 ± 0.05 μg/kg/min and 0.97 ± 0.22 μg/kg/min, respectively. The combination of propofol and REMI or ALF provided satisfactory anesthesia in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2011.07.002
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1098-612X
1532-2750
1532-2750
DOI:10.1016/j.jfms.2011.07.002