My Loss Is Your Loss [ellipsis (horizontal)] Sometimes: Loss Aversion and the Effect of Motivational Biases

Findings from previous studies of individual decision-making behavior predict that losses will loom larger than gains. It is less clear, however, if this loss aversion applies to the way in which individuals attribute value to the gains and losses of others, or if it is robust across a broad spectru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRisk analysis Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 929 - 938
Main Authors Wilson, Robyn S, Arvai, Joseph L, Arkes, Hal R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.08.2008
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Findings from previous studies of individual decision-making behavior predict that losses will loom larger than gains. It is less clear, however, if this loss aversion applies to the way in which individuals attribute value to the gains and losses of others, or if it is robust across a broad spectrum of policy and management decision contexts. Consistent with previous work, the results from a series of experiments reported here revealed that subjects exhibited loss aversion when evaluating their own financial gains and losses. The presence of loss aversion was also confirmed for the way in which individuals attribute value to the financial gains and losses of others. However, similar evaluations within social and environmental contexts did not exhibit loss aversion. In addition, research subjects expected that individuals who were unknown to them would significantly undervalue the subjects' own losses across all contexts. The implications of these findings for risk-based policy and management are many. Specifically, they warrant caution when relying upon loss aversion to explain or predict the reaction of affected individuals to risk-based decisions that involve moral or protected values. The findings also suggest that motivational biases may lead decisionmakers to assume that their attitudes and beliefs are common among those affected by a decision, while those affected may expect unfamiliar others to be unable to identify and act in accordance with shared values.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01065.x
istex:32F5C9EB61B040E5B9CAA544812880595F3F5AD3
ark:/67375/WNG-T9RRN0Z7-K
ArticleID:RISA1065
School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University.
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.
Department of Community, Agriculture, Resource and Recreation Studies, Michigan State University.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-4332
1539-6924
1539-6924
DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01065.x