An Experimental Population Study of Nucleotide Excision Repair as a Risk Factor for UVB-induced Melanoma

• Published in: Photochemistry and photobiology Vol. 87; no. 2; pp. 335 - 341
• Main Authors: Fernandez, André A., Garcia, Rachel, Paniker, Lakshmi, Trono, David, Mitchell, David L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2011
• Subjects: Age Factors; Animals; Cell cycle; Cyprinodontiformes; Deoxyribonucleic acid; Disease Models, Animal; DNA; DNA repair; DNA Repair - genetics; Genetic Variation; Human subjects; Irradiation; Melanoma; Melanoma, Experimental; Population genetics; Population studies; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Skin cancer; Skin Neoplasms; Ultraviolet Rays; Xiphophorus
• ISSN: 0031-8655; 1751-1097; 1751-1097
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00875.x

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the primary defense against the DNA damage implicit in skin cancer formation and is negatively affected by chronic exposure to UVB radiation. However, in situ and in vitro studies consistently yield equivocal results when addressing individual DNA repair capacity and melanoma susceptibility. The primary objective of this study was to determine if individual global NER capacity is a risk factor for melanoma formation in a prominent UVB‐inducible melanoma model, hybrid Xiphophorus fishes. After neonatal UVB irradiation, adult tumor‐bearing and tumor‐free fish were given a challenge UVB dose and (6–4) photoproduct repair was quantified in individual fish at 24 h using radioimmunoassay. Despite considerable inter‐individual variation in repair capacity, ranging from 13% to 91%, we found no difference in mean NER capacity between fish with and without melanomas, thus detaching global NER from melanomagenesis. Furthermore, despite epidemiological data indicating that sex and age are important risk factors underlying melanoma susceptibility, we found no difference in mean NER rates among the sexes or as a function of age. We conclude with a discussion of the apparent paradox of how inter‐individual variation in NER is not a risk factor given the clear evidence that DNA damage underlies melanoma susceptibility.