ITMIG Consensus Statement on the Use of the WHO Histological Classification of Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma: Refined Definitions, Histological Criteria, and Reporting

The 2004 version of the World Health Organization classification subdivides thymic epithelial tumors into A, AB, B1, B2, and B3 (and rare other) thymomas and thymic carcinomas (TC). Due to a morphological continuum between some thymoma subtypes and some morphological overlap between thymomas and TC,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thoracic oncology Vol. 9; no. 5; pp. 596 - 611
Main Authors Marx, Alexander, Ströbel, Philipp, Badve, Sunil S., Chalabreysse, Lara, Chan, John K.C., Chen, Gang, de Leval, Laurence, Detterbeck, Frank, Girard, Nicolas, Huang, Jim, Kurrer, Michael O., Lauriola, Libero, Marino, Mirella, Matsuno, Yoshihiro, Molina, Thierry Jo, Mukai, Kiyoshi, Nicholson, Andrew G., Nonaka, Daisuke, Rieker, Ralf, Rosai, Juan, Ruffini, Enrico, Travis, William D.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2014
Copyright by the European Lung Cancer Conference and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The 2004 version of the World Health Organization classification subdivides thymic epithelial tumors into A, AB, B1, B2, and B3 (and rare other) thymomas and thymic carcinomas (TC). Due to a morphological continuum between some thymoma subtypes and some morphological overlap between thymomas and TC, a variable proportion of cases may pose problems in classification, contributing to the poor interobserver reproducibility in some studies. To overcome this problem, hematoxylin-eosin–stained and immunohistochemically processed sections of prototypic, “borderland,” and “combined” thymomas and TC (n = 72) were studied by 18 pathologists at an international consensus slide workshop supported by the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group. Consensus was achieved on refined criteria for decision making at the A/AB borderland, the distinction between B1, B2, and B3 thymomas and the separation of B3 thymomas from TCs. “Atypical type A thymoma” is tentatively proposed as a new type A thymoma variant. New reporting strategies for tumors with more than one histological pattern are proposed. These guidelines can set the stage for reproducibility studies and the design of a clinically meaningful grading system for thymic epithelial tumors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-News-1
content type line 25
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Conference-2
SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1556-0864
1556-1380
DOI:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000154