IRF-1 responsiveness to IFN-γ predicts different cancer immune phenotypes

Background: Several lines of evidence suggest a dichotomy between immune active and quiescent cancers, with the former associated with a good prognostic phenotype and better responsiveness to immunotherapy. Central to such dichotomy is the master regulator of the acute inflammatory process interfero...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of cancer Vol. 109; no. 1; pp. 76 - 82
Main Authors Murtas, D, Maric, D, De Giorgi, V, Reinboth, J, Worschech, A, Fetsch, P, Filie, A, Ascierto, M L, Bedognetti, D, Liu, Q, Uccellini, L, Chouchane, L, Wang, E, Marincola, F M, Tomei, S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 09.07.2013
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Several lines of evidence suggest a dichotomy between immune active and quiescent cancers, with the former associated with a good prognostic phenotype and better responsiveness to immunotherapy. Central to such dichotomy is the master regulator of the acute inflammatory process interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-1. However, it remains unknown whether the responsiveness of IRF-1 to cytokines is able to differentiate cancer immune phenotypes. Methods: IRF-1 activation was measured in 15 melanoma cell lines at basal level and after treatment with IFN- γ , TNF- α and a combination of both. Microarray analysis was used to compare transcriptional patterns between cell lines characterised by high or low IRF-1 activation. Results: We observed a strong positive correlation between IRF-1 activation at basal level and after IFN- γ and TNF- α treatment. Microarray demonstrated that three cell lines with low and three with high IRF-1 inducible translocation scores differed in the expression of 597 transcripts. Functional interpretation analysis showed mTOR and Wnt/ β -cathenin as the top downregulated pathways in the cell lines with low inducible IRF-1 activation, suggesting that a low IRF-1 inducibility recapitulates a cancer phenotype already described in literature characterised by poor prognosis. Conclusion: Our findings support the central role of IRF-1 in influencing different tumour phenotypes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
These authors contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.335