Continuous Exposure to Chrysotile Asbestos Can Cause Transformation of Human Mesothelial Cells via HMGB1 and TNF-α Signaling

Malignant mesothelioma is strongly associated with asbestos exposure. Among asbestos fibers, crocidolite is considered the most and chrysotile the least oncogenic. Chrysotile accounts for more than 90% of the asbestos used worldwide, but its capacity to induce malignant mesothelioma is still debated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of pathology Vol. 183; no. 5; pp. 1654 - 1666
Main Authors Qi, Fang, Okimoto, Gordon, Jube, Sandro, Napolitano, Andrea, Pass, Harvey I, Laczko, Rozalia, DeMay, Richard M, Khan, Ghazal, Tiirikainen, Maarit, Rinaudo, Caterina, Croce, Alessandro, Yang, Haining, Gaudino, Giovanni, Carbone, Michele
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2013
American Society for Investigative Pathology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Malignant mesothelioma is strongly associated with asbestos exposure. Among asbestos fibers, crocidolite is considered the most and chrysotile the least oncogenic. Chrysotile accounts for more than 90% of the asbestos used worldwide, but its capacity to induce malignant mesothelioma is still debated. We found that chrysotile and crocidolite exposures have similar effects on human mesothelial cells. Morphological and molecular alterations suggestive of epithelial–mesenchymal transition, such as E-cadherin down-regulation and β-catenin phosphorylation followed by nuclear translocation, were induced by both chrysotile and crocidolite. Gene expression profiling revealed high-mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1) as a key regulator of the transcriptional alterations induced by both types of asbestos. Crocidolite and chrysotile induced differential expression of 438 out of 28,869 genes interrogated by oligonucleotide microarrays. Out of these 438 genes, 57 were associated with inflammatory and immune response and cancer, and 14 were HMGB1 targeted genes. Crocidolite-induced gene alterations were sustained, whereas chrysotile-induced gene alterations returned to background levels within 5 weeks. Similarly, HMGB1 release in vivo progressively increased for 10 or more weeks after crocidolite exposure, but returned to background levels within 8 weeks after chrysotile exposure. Continuous administration of chrysotile was required for sustained high serum levels of HMGB1. These data support the hypothesis that differences in biopersistence influence the biological activities of these two asbestos fibers.
ISSN:0002-9440
1525-2191
DOI:10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.07.029