Evaluation of Ocular Surface Disease in Patients with Glaucoma

Purpose To evaluate the subjective and objective measures of ocular surface disease in patients with glaucoma. Design Cross-sectional study. Participants Sixty-four glaucoma subjects with bilateral visual field (VF) loss and 59 glaucoma suspects with normal VFs. Methods Consecutive patients were rec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 120; no. 11; pp. 2241 - 2248
Main Authors Mathews, Priya M., BS, BA, Ramulu, Pradeep Y., MD, PhD, Friedman, David S., MD, PhD, Utine, Canan A., MD, MSc, Akpek, Esen K., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To evaluate the subjective and objective measures of ocular surface disease in patients with glaucoma. Design Cross-sectional study. Participants Sixty-four glaucoma subjects with bilateral visual field (VF) loss and 59 glaucoma suspects with normal VFs. Methods Consecutive patients were recruited prospectively from the Wilmer Eye Institute Glaucoma Clinic. Main Outcome Measures Tear film breakup time (TBUT), corneal staining score (0–15), and Schirmer's test results were included as objective metrics, whereas the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was administered to assess symptoms. Total OSDI score, vision-related subscore (derived from questions about vision and task performance), and discomfort-related subscore (derived from questions about ocular surface discomfort) were calculated for each subject. Results Seventy-five percent (48/64) of glaucoma subjects and 41% (24/59) of glaucoma suspects were receiving topical medications. The corneal staining grade was greater in glaucoma subjects than in glaucoma suspects (6.4 vs. 4.1; P <0.001), but groups did not differ with regard to TBUT or Schirmer's results ( P >0.20 for both). Multivariate regression models showed that topical glaucoma therapy burden was associated with a significantly higher total corneal staining grade (β, +0.9 for each additional glaucoma drop; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–1.3; P <0.001), but not with TBUT or Schirmer's results ( P >0.20 for both). Glaucoma subjects had significantly higher total OSDI scores than glaucoma suspects (16.7 vs. 7.9; P <0.001). This largely was the result of higher vision-related subscores in the glaucoma group (11.1 vs. 3.3; P <0.001). Ocular discomfort–related subscores, however, were similar in both groups (5.7 vs. 4.6; P  = 0.30). In multivariate analyses, each 5-decibel decrement in better-eye VF mean deviation was associated with a 4.7-point increase in total OSDI score (95% CI, 1.9–7.5; P  = 0.001) and a 3.7-point increase in the vision-related subscore (95% CI, 1.7–5.6; P <0.001) but did not predict a higher discomfort-related subscore (β, 1.1 point; P  = 0.07). Topical glaucoma therapy burden was not associated with higher total OSDI score or vision- or discomfort-related subscore ( P >0.20 for all). Conclusions Glaucoma is associated with significant ocular surface disease, and topical glaucoma therapy burden seems predictive of corneal staining severity. However, OSDI is a poor metric for capturing ocular surface disease in glaucoma because symptoms seem to be related largely to VF loss. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-6420
1549-4713
DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.03.045