Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Mechanical Workplace Risk Factors and Low Back Pain

We used individual participant data from multiple studies to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of mechanical exposures in the workplace and low back pain. We conducted a systematic literature search and contacted an author of each study to request their individual participant data. Because outco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of public health (1971) Vol. 102; no. 2; pp. 309 - 318
Main Authors GRIFFITH, Lauren E, SHANNON, Harry S, WELLS, Richard P, WALTER, Stephen D, COLE, Donald C, COTE, Pierre, FRANK, John, HOGG-JOHNSON, Sheilah, LANGLOIS, Lacey E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Public Health Association 01.02.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We used individual participant data from multiple studies to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of mechanical exposures in the workplace and low back pain. We conducted a systematic literature search and contacted an author of each study to request their individual participant data. Because outcome definitions and exposure measures were not uniform across studies, we conducted 2 substudies: (1) to identify sets of outcome definitions that could be combined in a meta-analysis and (2) to develop methods to translate mechanical exposure onto a common metric. We used generalized estimating equation regression to analyze the data. The odds ratios (ORs) for posture exposures ranged from 1.1 to 2.0. Force exposure ORs ranged from 1.4 to 2.1. The magnitudes of the ORs differed according to the definition of low back pain, and heterogeneity was associated with both study-level and individual-level characteristics. We found small to moderate ORs for the association of mechanical exposures and low back pain, although the relationships were complex. The presence of individual-level OR modifiers in such an area can be best understood by conducting a meta-analysis of individual participant data.
Bibliography:Peer Reviewed
L. E. Griffith contributed to obtaining funding; originating the study; the conduct, design, analysis, interpretation of all aspects of the study; and writing the article. H. S. Shannon contributed to obtaining funding; originating the study; the design, analysis, interpretation of all aspects of the study; and writing the article. R. P. Wells contributed to obtaining funding, originating the study, developing and testing exposure scales, interpretation, and writing the article. S. D. Walter contributed to obtaining funding, originating the study, design, analysis, interpretation, and writing the article. D. C. Cole and S. Hogg-Johnson contributed to obtaining funding, originating the study, developing a method of outcome categorization, interpretation, and writing the article. P. Côté contributed to obtaining funding, validating the exposure scales, interpretation, and writing the article. J. Frank contributed to obtaining funding, design, interpretation, and writing the article. L. E. Langlois contributed to the conduct of the study, developing a quality assessment tool, and writing the article.
Contributors
ISSN:0090-0036
1541-0048
DOI:10.2105/ajph.2011.300343